雅思作文带翻译范文
越来越多的合格人士正从贫穷国家向富国转移，以填补工程、计算机和医学等专业领域的职位空缺。有些人认为，通过鼓励这样的人的运动，富国从贫穷国家偷窃。其他人认为这只是全世界工人自然运动的一部分。你同意还是不同意?下面是小编分享的雅思社会类英语作文，欢迎大家阅读!
雅思作文范文【1】
More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world.
Do you agree or disagree?
Model Answer:
The so-called ‘brain drain’ from poor to rich countries is now robbing poorer countries of essential personnel like doctors, nurses, engineers, and the trend is set to continue, if not to get worse.
Some people say this movement of people around the world is not a new phenomenon. Migrant workers have always been attracted by the wider choice of employment and greater opportunity in major cities in their own countries and abroad. Recently, as the technological age has advanced and as richer countries find themselves with not enough workers to feed their development, they have had to run to other parts of the world to find the necessary manpower. Many richer European countries, for example, are now trying to attract skilled IT workers from my home country India by offering higher salaries than they could hope to earn at home. With the globalisation of the world economy, many people feel that the process cannot be stopped.
Others, myself included, are of the opinion that measures should be taken to address the problem, by compensating poorer countries financially for the loss of investment in the people they have trained, like doctors and nurses. Admittedly, this may be cumbersome to administer, but an attempt could be made to get it off the ground. Another step, which in part has already begun to happen, is to use the forces of globalization itself. Western countries could encourage people to stay in their own countries by direct investment in projects like computer factories or by sending patients abroad for treatment, as is already happening.
It is obviously difficult to restrict the movement of people around the world and it is probably foolish to try to stop it, but attempts should be made to redress the imbalance.
参考翻译
所谓的“人才外流”从贫穷到富裕的国家现在掠夺贫穷国家的基本人员，如医生，护士，工程师，这种趋势将继续下去，如果不恶化。
有人说，这个世界各地的人的运动不是一个新现象。农民工在国内外各大城市就业机会的选择和就业机会的增加一直吸引着农民工。最近，随着科技时代的进步，更富裕的国家发现自己没有足够的工人来养活他们的发展，他们不得不跑到世界的其他地方去寻找必要的人力。例如，许多富裕的欧洲国家正试图通过提供比他们希望在国内获得的薪水更高的工资来吸引来自印度本土的技术工人。随着世界经济的全球化，许多人觉得这个过程不能停止。
其他人，包括我在内，认为应该采取措施来解决这个问题，通过补偿贫困国家的财政损失的投资，他们所培训的人，如医生和护士。诚然，这可能是繁琐的管理，但尝试可以使它离开地面。另一步，部分已经开始发生，是利用全球化本身的力量。西方国家可以鼓励人们留在自己的国家直接投资的项目，如电脑工厂或发送病人出国治疗，因为已经发生。
很显然，限制世界各地的人们的运动是很困难的，试图阻止它可能是愚蠢的，但应该尝试纠正这种失衡。
雅思作文范文【2】
In most countries multinational companies and their products are becoming more and more important. This trend is seriously damaging our quality of life.
Do you agree or disagree?
Model Answer:
Multinational companies nowadays find it convenient both to market their goods all over the world and set up production facilities wherever they find it convenient. In my opinion this has had an adverse effect on our quality of life in three main areas.
The first area is their products. Supporters of globalization would argue that multinational companies make high-quality goods available to more people. While this may be true to some extent, it also means that we have less choice of products to consume. When powerful multinational companies invade local markets with their goods, they often are obliged local companies with fewer resources to go out of business. In consequence, we are obliged to buy multinational products whether we like them or not.
This brings me to my second point. It is sometimes said that multinational companies and globalisation are making societies more open. This may be true. However, I would point out that as a result the human race is losing its cultural diversity. If we consumed varied products, societieswherever we live would be more varied. This can be seen by the fact that we all shop in identicalmultinational supermarkets and buy identical products wherever we live.
Thirdly, defenders of multinational companies often point out that they provide jobs. Although this is undoubtedly true, it also means that we have become more valnurable on them, which in turn makes us more vulnerable to their decisions. When, for example, a multinational decides to move its production facilities to another country, this has an adverse effect on its workers who lose their jobs.
All in all, I believe that if we as voters pressured our governments to make multinational companies more responsible and to protect local producers from outside competition, we could have the benefits of globalisation without its disadvantages.
参考翻译：
如今，跨国公司在世界各地都可以方便地销售他们的产品，并且在任何方便的地方建立生产设施。我认为这在三个主要方面对我们的`生活质量产生了不利影响。
第一个领域是他们的产品。全球化的支持者认为跨国公司可以为更多的人提供高质量的产品。虽然这可能是在一定程度上是真实的，这也意味着我们有较少的产品选择消费。当强大的跨国公司用他们的产品入侵当地市场时，他们往往会被迫让本土资源少的企业破产。因此，无论我们喜不喜欢，我们都有义务购买跨国产品。
这使我想起了我的第二点。有时说跨国公司和全球化正在使社会更加开放。这可能是真的。然而，我要指出的是，人类正在失去其文化多样性。如果我们消费各种各样的产品，我们生活的社会就会更加多样化。我们都可以在同一家跨国超市里购物，无论我们住在哪里都能买到相同的产品，这可以看出这一点。
第三，跨国公司的捍卫者经常指出他们提供工作。虽然这无疑是正确的，这也意味着我们已经成为他们更valnurable，这反过来又使我们更容易受到他们的决定。例如，当跨国公司决定将生产设施转移到另一个国家时，这对其失去工作的工人产生了不利影响。
总之，我相信，如果我们作为选民施压我们的政府，使跨国公司更负责任，并保护本地生产者免受外部竞争，我们可以有全球化的好处，而没有缺点。
【雅思作文带翻译范文】相关文章：