2017年托福写作真题训练题
在真题中更容易找到考试出题规律，以下百分网小编整理的托福写作真题训练题，希望对大家复习有所帮助，更多信息请关注应届毕业生网!
综合写作
|
READNING |
LISTENING |
|
Inuktitut 语言没有人说的语言 |
|
|
1 调查说25％的.16岁以下年轻人都不说这个语言了 |
1 这个survey不准确，通过face to face的调查很多人都说这个语言。年轻人不说这种语言是因为不讲传统，他们的爷爷奶奶还是讲这种语言的。 |
|
2 financial burden. 当地主要是渔业，渔业要卖给外国人，要用英语交流。 |
2 尽管很多国际的用英语，很多local的fishers都用I语。所以很多家长愿意让小孩两种都学。 |
|
3 Media的影响。很多媒体都是用英文。 |
3 如果只看radio和TV，的确是英文。但是如果看看social media，大家还是说使用着用语言的。 |
独立写作
Independent Writing:
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: One quality that a successful leader must have is to make decision quickly; when a leader takes too much time to make decisions, he will be seen as ineffective to the people he lead. 2014. 8.22 NA
【拓展阅读】托福写作范文：政府保护自然环境应采取什么措施
此题为三选一
What is the most important action for the government to take for the protection of environmental problems? Fund researches on new energy sources such as solar and wind power? Protect forests and natural wildlife species? Pass and enforce laws to reduce the pollution.
三选一类题目会给出三个选项A, B, C让学生去选择一个。这种题的答题方法为开头段-正文段第一段B好-正文段第二段B的另一个优点-正文段第三段B比A好/A的缺点和B比C好/C的缺点-结尾段。
2016年6月25日托福独立写作真题回顾
What one of the following is the most important action for the government to take for the protection of natural environment?
(1)fund research on new energy sources such as solar and wind power;
(2)preserve natural places such as forests and natural wildlife species.
(3)pass and enforce laws to reduce the pollution produced by companies and industries
点睛：
题目大意：对政府来说，要想保护自然环境，政府最应该采取哪项措施：资助研究新能源，保护栖息地和动物，制定法规来减少公司的污染排放。 此题目为三选一的题目，波波提醒各位小伙伴，对于这样的题目，我们有两点要做到：1.必须要清楚选出一个选项，2.三个选项在整篇文章论述中务必都要提到。只要能做到上述两点即可，所以三选一题目的写作结构非常灵活，下面是一种写法，仅供参考。
托福独立写作范文：
Taking a panoromic view of human history, we can readily find that the natural environment plays an enormously important role in determing the future of each and every country. Given the great significance of clean environment, the general public as well as the governors begin to wonder which is the most essential action to protect the environment, among funding new energy research, preserving natural habitat or enacting strict laws. Towards such a long-running tug-of-war, I am inclined to argue that national governments should invest financial support in developing new energy sources.
Initially, spending more money in discovering new energy can radically solve the various environmental problems. As is common sense, the deteriorating environment is the result of the overexploitation of fossil fuels, including coal, oil and natural gas. To be specific, numerous chemical plants usually burn the coal to provide power for manufacturing all kinds of goods designed to satisfy the basic needs of the general public. As a result, a large amounts of industrial wastes are discharged to take a toll on the natural environment. Also, an increasing number of petrol-powered automobiles will definitely emit car exhause(e.g. fumes and toxic gas), which can increase the likelihood of the public suffering from respiratory diseases. All the above problems related to environment can be resolved by find new and clean energy like solar energy, wind power and tidal power. Undoubtedly, replacing the traditional energy with the new ones can dramatically decrease the pollution and contamination, thus leading to a better living environment. For example, once the cars uses the electricity instead of petrol, the air quality will improve to a large extent.
Secondly, there are conspicuous limitation of the other two options. As for preserving natural places, the effect of this practice is relatively restricted. To illustrate, the traditional energy sources are usually exploited and discovered in the natural places. Consequently, the preservation of natural places will hinder the access to various energy and thus impede the progress of the whole society. Also, the same logic applies to passing laws to reduce pollution. It is an indisputable fact that across the globe, many countries now are heaviely dependent on the industries and factories which produce pollutions. In other words, once the law of punishing these companies is enforced, these corporation may have to cut down their output and make less profits, even ending up going bankcrupt. Accordingly, the national economy and the living standard of the public will suffer too.
Factoring what has been discussed above, we can conclude that funding research of environmental friendly energy will be more preferable, because finding proper alternative energy is the key to solving the environmental problems comprehensively.
【2017年托福写作真题训练题】相关文章：
1.托福写作真题练习