2017年雅思考试优秀作文范文
导语：复习雅思写作，怎少得了参考别人的优秀作文范文?下面是YJBYS小编整理的2017年雅思考试优秀作文范文，希望对你有帮助!
Passage One
Which kind of courses should universities provide: theoretical knowledge or practical training? Some people prefer the later one and assert that the practical training can benefit our society. Personally, I strongly disagree with their point of view for three reasons.
Among countless factors which influence my propensity, there is a most conspicuous one: practical experience should be accumulated in society, not in universities. I can think of no better illustration than the saying: “society is another kind of university” (Mao Zedong). Literarily, in society people can study practical knowledge as well as studying theoretical knowledge in universities. Besides, campus is full of academic atmosphere, and there is totally different from the circumstance in society. Thus, it is difficult for students to accumulate the real practical experience in campus.
The second aspect relates to the importance of theoretical knowledge. Apparently, it would seem that some academic subjects, such as mathematics or sociology, cannot benefit companies or society directly. In fact, however, they are the basis of practical subjects, such as management or finance. For example, it is almost impossible to talk of economics without mentioning the fundamental roles played by statistics and mathematics.
Furthermore, universities are where theoretical knowledge is handed down from generation to generation. As we know, form Oxford University to Yale University, from Beijing University to MIT, universities congregate a lot of preeminent scholars and professors whose main jobs are the academic research. They are responsible to impart the academic knowledge to the young generation in case of they are faded from our memory.
In summary, from what has been discussed above, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that the theoretical courses are not as obsolete, profitless and unimportant as some people believed. And our universities should be responsible to provide the theoretical knowledge.
Passage Two
题目：Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
范文：
It is sometimes argued that tourists from overseas should be charged more than local residents to visit important sites and monuments. I completely disagree with this idea.
The argument in favour of higher prices for foreign tourists would be that cultural or historical attractions often depend on state subsidies to keep them going, which means that the resident population already pays money to these sites through the tax system. However, I believe this to be a very shortsighted view. Foreign tourists contribute to the economy of the host country with the money they spend on a wide range of goods and services, including food, souvenirs, accommodation and travel. The governments and inhabitants of every country should be happy to subsidise important tourist sites and encourage people from the rest of the world to visit them.
If travellers realised that they would have to pay more to visit historical and cultural attractions in a particular nation, they would perhaps decide not to go to that country on holiday. To take the UK as an example, the tourism industry and many related jobs rely on visitors coming to the country to see places like Windsor Castle or Saint Paul’s Cathedral. These two sites charge the same price regardless of nationality, and this helps to promote the nation’s cultural heritage. If overseas tourists stopped coming due to higher prices, there would be a risk of insufficient funding for the maintenance of these important buildings.
In conclusion, I believe that every effort should be made to attract tourists from overseas, and it would be counterproductive to make them pay more than local residents.
Passage Three
题目：Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?
范文：
It is true that foreign films are more popular in many countries than domestically produced films. There could be several reasons why this is the case, and I believe that governments should promote local film-making by subsidising the industry.
There are various reasons why many people find foreign films more enjoyable than the films produced in their own countries. Firstly, the established film industries in certain countries have huge budgets for action, special effects and to shoot scenes in spectacular locations. Hollywood blockbusters like ‘Avatar’ or the James Bond films are examples of such productions and the global appeal that they have. Another reason why these big-budget films are so successful is that they often star the most famous actors and actresses, and they are made by the most accomplished producers and directors. The poor quality, low-budget filmmaking in many countries suffers in comparison.
In my view, governments should support local film industries financially. In every country, there may be talented amateur film-makers who just need to be given the opportunity to prove themselves. To compete with big-budget productions from overseas, these people need money to pay for film crews, actors and a host of other costs related to producing high-quality films. If governments did help with these costs, they would see an increase in employment in the film industry, income from film sales, and perhaps even a rise in tourist numbers. New Zealand, for example, has seen an increase in tourism related to the 'Lord of the Rings' films, which were partly funded by government subsidies.
In conclusion, I believe that increased financial support could help to raise the quality of locally made films and allow them to compete with the foreign productions that currently dominate the market.
Passage Four
Task:
Public libraries should only provide books and not waste their limited resources on multimedia materials such as videos or DVDs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
公共图书馆应该只提供书籍而不是浪费有限资源在多媒体材料诸如光碟或者DVD上。多大程度上你同意此观点?
参考范文：
Today, people live in an age of knowledge explosion, more and more people realize the significance of acquiring knowledge. Therefore, public libraries have turned increasingly prevalent. Some people believe that the libraries should not provide multimedia resources such as DVDs and videos. Personally, I am convinced that the multimedia resources are necessary parts of a library.
Admittedly, if the public libraries only provide books for readers, the volume and the quality of the management will be improved. For example, the resources occupied by multimedia can be used to store more books. Sometimes when the popular books have too many borrowers, the library can spend the saved money to purchase more books so that they are available to different learners. Also, without offering DVDs or videos, more staff can be assigned to keep and renew the record of the borrowers and thus improving the efficiency of managing the books.
However, multimedia resources allow the learners to have access to different information through diverse ways and meet the demands of some visual learners. There are some people who prefer to learn through DVDs or videos because they think that is more direct and convenient, especially for those who have difficulties in reading. Multimedia could open the door to the world of knowledge for them. Without multimedia resources, only a certain group of people has the chance to study history, culture, language and cooking skills though books.
From my perspective, the public libraries exist as a kind of traditional place for the learners to wander in the world of knowledge. Therefore, the main resources they provide should be books because according to some surveys, books still have profound influences in our life. On the other hand, living in the modern society with the rapid development of multimedia, the public libraries should also keep abreast with the trend by offering DVDs or videos and other kinds of multimedia resources.
【2017年雅思考试优秀作文范文】相关文章：