2016年5月雅思写作考试大作文

相关推荐

2016年5月雅思写作考试大作文

　　2016年5月有四场雅思考试，有两场写作就谈到了关于孩子的教育问题，下面是小编整理的范文，欢迎阅读!

2016年5月雅思写作考试大作文

　　2016年5月7日雅思写作考试大作文

　　Some people think teaching children different abilities together benefits everyone, but others think intelligent children should be taught separately and given special treatment. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

　　有人认为集中给孩子们教授不同的技能可以使所有的'人收益，但有人认为聪明的孩子应该单独培养特殊对待。讨论以上2种观点并给出你的看法。

　　参考范文：

　　An undeniable(不可否认的) fact in our life is that some children are more intelligent(聪明的) or capable(有才能的)than their peers. However,whether these children should be taught separately has long been a topic of debate.

　　If students with different abilities are put in the same class the first benefit is that they can learn from each other and draw on (吸取) other people's strengths. A mathematical(数学的) genius(天才) may be poor in arts or sports and this is what he can improve by interacting(互动) with his classmates. Also why we object to separate teaching is that teachers tend to pay more attention to those with better academic results which may give students in the slow class a sense of discrimination(歧视).

　　However,some people believe that children should be put in different classes according to their abilities. This mode enables students particularly(尤其) those intelligent ones to fully develop their potentials(潜力).In their own class: they can be given special training without worrying that their classmates cannot keep up with the class. This also seems to be a reasonable arrangement for those ordinary students who would feel less stressed . With students of similar abilities in one class it would be easier for schools to make their teaching plans and control the progress.

　　From my point of view,to promote an all-around(全方位) development it is better to have students study together regardless of their abilities and talents. However this is not against individualized teaching and learning in our schools. In addition to standardized teaching plans some extra-curricular programs can be designed for students with particular talents in some aspects

　　5月19日雅思考试写作大作文范文

　　In many countries women are able to join the armed forces. However, some people think only men should be members of the army, navy and air force. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　很多国家，女人能够加入武装部队。然而，一些人认为只有男人应该成为陆军，海军和空军的一员，多大程度上你同意或不同意?

　　参考范文：

　　The opinion that women should join the army or be police as equally as men is popularly held amongst some egalitarians recently. They tend to believe women are capable of handling these masculine jobs as men do.

　　In some extent, of course they are right. All along we clamored for equality. Since we have achieved a marvelous progress, for example, women now have the right to vote as men do. Then why can’t we put forward the success to the military level? After all, as another part of our nation, it’s thus reasonably for women to shoulder the responsibility of protecting our country and guard the security of our society.

　　Nevertheless, it’s necessary to remember that the equality between men and women means the society should not discriminate women in terms of citizenship rights, working capability, family roles and so on, and by becoming a police or soldier isn’t the rational way to demonstrate equality.

　　The truth is that there are differences in men and women, thus leading to their different choices toward career. Jobs like teacher, nurse, advisers are featured as more feminine thus can generally be done better by women; while soldiers, police are more suitable for men. In fact, without any external forces, men are more likely to choose to be the breadwinner of families over to staying at home looking after children whereas women appear to act the exact opposite way.

　　Another relevant point to remember is manual work is not designed for women. Even if the government compulsorily get equal number of women on army list to men. This would only end up bringing down the overall strength of the army.

　　In conclusion, we should remember that equality is compatible with difference. Only when we take the right attitude toward equality can it plays the most significant role in our society.

　　5月21日雅思考试写作大作文范文

　　Some people argue that countries should have a moral obligation to help each other; on the other hand, some people argue that a large amount of aid money does not reach the poor of the world. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

　　有人认为国家之间应该有相互帮助的道义责任。另一方面，有人认为大笔的艾滋病款项没有到达世界上的'贫困地区。讨论这两种观点并给出自己的观点。

　　参考范文：

　　In this age of globalization, nations are closely bonded than ever before. So it is quite common for rich countries to give international aid to the more impoverished ones. Generally, I think that it is the right thing to do and that the aid can take different forms besides capital.

　　People who are concerned the fact that financial support might not go to the poor would argue that the poorest nations are typically badly governed, where corruption, official incompetence, and failure to protect basic property rights are capable of rendering the aid money not just useless but harmful.This could be a problem. However, the point here is not that we should be skeptical of the concept of international aid itself but that the way we implement it need be ca refully designed, and different types pf foreign assistance should be adopted accordingly.

　　The necessity and the significance of this practice are easily noted. With foreign investment, there tends to be mo chances of employment in less developed places, which means more income for local people and greater social stability for local communities. More direct benefits can also be noticed in the fields of medical care and education. As a result of medical donations and some dedicated medical teams in particular, several prevalent diseases have been controlled or eradicated in many poor nations. With the support of educational resources from developed countries, more schools have been set up in those less developed areas, so people there have more accesses to education, which actually helps to promote the development of those places in the long turn .

　　Overall, I am supportive of the idea that richer countries have a moral responsibility to help poor ones,and the influence of this endeavor is far-reaching and it should therefore be encouraged.

　　5月28日雅思考试写作大作文

　　New parents should attend parenting courses to learn how to bring up their children well. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　新晋父母应该参加育儿课程，学习如何抚养孩子。你在多大程度上同意或不同意?

　　参考范文：

　　A parenting course is one designed to help parents understand how to bring up their children in a better way. While many people think such a course is extremely useful, I think it is of very little use, if not at all, to parents who wish to give their children a better future.

　　In the first place, attending a parenting course is valuable to parents only in theory, but not in practice. Such a course usually tells the parents why they should do this and avoid doing that. For instance, parents are often told to let their children voice their opinions publicly, or encourage their children to follow certain rules and regulations. But as we know, bringing up a child is never so easy as remembering some set principles. It is a far more tricky and delicate undertaking. As each child is a unique case, the parents actually have nobody, not to mention any universal rule, to depend on but their own judgements and understanding. Pushing a child shy in nature to speak themselves out in public is no good, and making a child with a highly original mind follow others is like dampening their talents.

　　Additionally, taking a parenting course is sometimes costly in time and money. Normally, parents have to spend more than 100 hours on such a course, but this time could just as well be spent taking the child to the park or working together with the child towards the solution to a certain interesting problem. The more time parents spend with their children, the better upbringing the children may have. If the parents have to pay much money for a parenting course, then their children are sacrificed one more time: the books their parents buy for them with the money may never be bought now because their parents have spent the money on some stupid parenting course.

　　In my view, the parents take a parenting course due to laziness or a lack of confidence. They do not want to go into the life of their children but want to be told some "truths" about bringing up children; they do not believe in themselves but rather in books and what others tell them. A parenting course is thus not beneficial, but detrimental to parents when upbringing their children.

【5月雅思写作考试大作文】相关文章：

雅思写作标准05-17