2024年9月公共英语考试一级备考冲刺试题

相关推荐

　　无论是身处学校还是步入社会，我们经常跟试题打交道，试题是参考者回顾所学知识和技能的重要参考资料。什么样的试题才是科学规范的试题呢？下面是小编整理的2024年9月公共英语考试一级备考冲刺试题，供大家参考借鉴，希望可以帮助到有需要的朋友。

2024年9月公共英语考试一级备考冲刺试题

　　9月公共英语考试一级备考冲刺试题 1

　　Contribution of Coeducation

　　Imagining being asked to spend twelve or so years of your life in a society which consisted only of members of own sex. How would you react? Unless there was something definitely wrong with you， you wouldn’t be too happy about it， to say the least. It is all the more surprising therefore that so many parents in the world choose to impose such abnormal conditions on their children - conditions which they themselves wouldn’t put up with for one minute!

　　Any discussion of this topic is bound to question the aims of education. Stuffing children’s heads full of knowledge is far from being foremost among them. One of the chief aims of educations is to equip future citizens with all they require to take their place in adult society. Now adult society is made up of men and women， so how can a segregated school possibly offer the right sort of preparation for it? Anyone entering adult society after years of segregation can only be in for a shock.

　　A co-educational school offers children nothing less than a true version of society in miniature. Boys and girls are given the opportunity to get to know each other， to learn to live together from their earliest years. They are put in a position where they can compare themselves with each other in terms of academic ability， athletic achievement and many of the extra-curricular activities which are part of school life. What a practical advantage it is ( to give just a small example ) to be able to put on a school play in which the male parts will be taken by boys and the female parts by girls! What nonsense co-education makes of the argument that boys are cleverer than girl or vice-versa. When segregated， boys and girls are made to feel that they are a race apart. Rivalry between the sexes is fostered. In a coeducational school， everything falls into its proper place.

　　But perhaps the greatest contribution of co-education is the healthy attitude to life it encourages. Boys don’t grow up believing that women are mysterious creatures - airy goddesses， more like book-illustrations to a fairy-tale， than human beings. Girls don’t grow up imagining that men are romantic heroes. Years of living together at school dispel illusions of this kind. There are no goddesses with freckles， pigtails， piercing voices and inky fingers. There are no romantic heroes with knobbly knees， dirty fingernails and unkempt hair. The awkward stage of adolescence brings into sharp focus some of the physical and emotional problems involved in growing up. These can better be overcome in a co-educational environment. Segregated schools sometimes provide the right conditions for sexual deviation. This is hardly possible under a co-educational system. When the time comes for the pupils to leave school， they are fully prepared to enter society as well-adjusted adults. They have already had years of experience in coping with many of the problems that face men and women.

　　1. What is the best title for this passage?

　　A、 only co-education can be in harmony with society.

　　B、 people are in great need of co-education.

　　C、 any form of education other than co-education is simply unthinkable.

　　D、 co-education has many features.

　　2. what does co-education offer to children?

　　A、 A society.

　　B、 A true small model of society.

　　C、 A real life.

　　D、 True version of social condition.

　　3. According to the passage， what is one of the chief aims of education?

　　A、 It is for students to acquire knowledge.

　　B、 It is to equip future citizens with scientific technology.

　　C、 It is to equip future citizens with what is required in getting a position in society.

　　D、 It is for students to get academic achievements.

　　4. Why do boys and girls in co-education have no illusion about each other?

　　A、 They live together and know each other too well.

　　B、 Years of living together at school dismiss such illusion.

　　C、 co-education encourage them to have an healthy attitude toward life.

　　D、 They are familiar with each other’s problems.

　　Vocabulary

　　1. to be in for = receive 　接受

　　He is in for punishment.　他受到惩罚。

　　2. miniature 　缩样，雏形，微型画

　　3. freckle　雀斑

　　4. pigtail 　鞭子

　　5. knobbly = knobby　多节的

　　6. unkempt　乱七八糟，蓬乱的

　　7. sharp focus = clear view

　　bring into focus 　使集中在焦点上，对光

　　bring into sharp focus　这里的意义是：一目了然，明显突出

　　8. deviation 　越轨，偏离，入歧途

　　答案详解

　　1. C 　除了男女合校，其他形式的教育简直难以想象。答案见第一段“设想请你在一个只有你一样性别的人存在的社会生活12年光景，你会如何反应呢?除非你本人确实有毛病，否则，你至少不会太高兴。因此，世界上有那么多的父母愿意把这种不正常的环境(他们自己一分钟都受不了的环境)强加给他们的孩子们，这太令人惊讶!”第二段讲“教育的目的之一就是为未来的公民在成人社会中找一席之地，准备好需要的一切。而社会由男女组成，那分校又怎能准备?”后两段讲合校之优点，分校之缺点，具体对比突出主题。这都说明C 最合适。

　　A. 只有合校才能和社会相协调。

　　D. 合校有许多特点。这两项文章内容涉及到，但作为最佳标题则不确切。

　　B. 人们非常需要合校。文内没有直接谈到。

　　2. B 　一个真实社会的缩影。这在第三段第一句“男女合校确实能给孩子们提供一个社会真实的缩影。”下面的内容都是围绕这个主题而写的具体情况。如：生活在一起，彼此了解，对比等。

　　A. 社会。

　　C. 一种真实的生活。

　　D. 真实的社会情况。都没有B项那样确切。

　　3. C 　为未来公民在社会上拥有一席之地，准备好所需要的一切。这在第二段“这个话题的讨论必然会引出教育目的的问题。把各种知识塞进孩子头脑远不是教育主要的目的，教育的主要目的之一是为未来公民在成人社会求得一席之地，准备好所需一切。”

　　A. 学生学到只是。

　　B. 以科技武装未来公民。

　　C.为学生缺德学术成就。都只是知识学习的一个部分。

　　4.B 　几年学校共同生活打消了幻想。答案在第四段中，“在学校中，几年生活在一起消除这一类的幻想。没有什么脸上有雀斑，梳着鞭子，涂着指甲，尖的噪音的女神，也没有膝部有疙瘩，指甲脏兮兮，头发乱蓬蓬的浪漫英雄。棘手的青春期明显呈现出来的成长过程中身体上和感情上的问题，在男女合校环境中得到很好的解决。”

　　A. 他们生活在一起，彼此太了解。此答案太过，不是太了解而不产生幻想，而是了解情况；真人就在眼前，人就实际了，消除了幻想。

　　C. 合校鼓励他们对生活有一种健康积极的态度。这是合校的大方向，不是消除幻想的根本原因。

　　D. 他们熟悉彼此的问题。不全是消除幻想之因，而是处理问题的前奏。这在最后一段最后两句话有说明“当学生离校的时刻来到时，他们已是很有适应性的成人，为进入社会做好了充分准备。他们已有几年处理面临男女的许多问题的经验。”

　　9月公共英语考试一级备考冲刺试题 2

　　Vicious and Dangerous Sports Should be Banned by Law

　　When you think of the tremendous technological progress we have made, it’s amazing how little we have developed in other respects.We may speak contemptuously of the poor old Romans because they relished the orgies of slaughter that went on in their arenas.We may despise them because they mistook these goings on for entertainment.We may forgive them condescendingly because they lived 2000 years ago and obviously knew no better.But are our feelings of superiority really justified? Are we any less blood-thirsty? Why do boxing matches, for instance, attract such universal interest? Don’t the spectators who attend them hope they will see some violence? Human beings remains as bloodthirsty as ever they were.The only difference between ourselves and the Romans is that while they were honest enough to admit that they enjoyed watching hungey lions tearing people apart and eating them alive, we find all sorts of sophisticated arguments to defend sports which should have been banned long age； sports which are quite as barbarous as, say, public hangings or bearbaiting.

　　It really is incredible that in this day and age we should still allow hunting or bull-fighting, that we should be prepared to sit back and watch two men batter each other to pulp in a boxing ring, that we should be relatively unmoved by the sight of one or a number of racing cars crashing and bursting into flames.Let us not deceive ourselves.Any talk of ‘the sporting spirit’ is sheer hypocrisy.People take part in violent sports because of the high rewards they bring.Spectators are willing to pay vast sums of money to see violence.A world heavyweight championship match, for instance, is front page news.Millions of people are disappointed if a big fight is over in two rounds instead of fifteen.They feel disappointment because they have been deprived of the exquisite pleasure of witnessing prolonged torture and violence.

　　Why should we ban violent sports if people enjoy them so much? You may well ask.The answer is simple: they are uncivilized.For centuries man has been trying to improve himself spiritually and emotionally - admittedly with little success.But at least we no longer tolerate the sight madmen cooped up in cages, or public floggings of any of the countless other barbaric practices which were common in the past.Prisons are no longer the grim forbidding places they used to be.Social welfare systems are in operation in many parts of the world.Big efforts are being made to distribute wealth fairly.These changes have come about not because human beings have suddenly and unaccountably improved, but because positive steps were taken to change the law.The law is the biggest instrument of social change that we have and it may exert great civilizing influence.If we banned dangerous and violent sports, we would be moving one step further to improving mankind.We would recognize that violence is degrading and unworthy of human beings.

　　1.It can be inferred from the passage that the author’s opinion of nowadays’ human beings is

　　A.not very high.

　　B.high.

　　C.contemptuous.

　　D.critical.

　　2.The main idea of this passage is

　　A.vicious and dangerous sports should be banned by law.

　　B.people are willing to pay vast sums money to see violence.

　　C.to compare two different attitudes towards dangerous sports.

　　D.people are bloodthirsty in sports.

　　3.That the author mentions the old Romans is

　　A.To compare the old Romans with today’s people.

　　B.to give an example.

　　C.to show human beings in the past know nothing better.

　　D.to indicate human beings are used to bloodthirsty.

　　4.How many dangerous sports does the author mention in this passage?

　　A.Three.

　　B.Five.

　　C.Six.

　　D.Seven.

　　5.The purpose of the author in writing this passage is

　　A.that, by banning the violent sports, we human beings can improve our selves.

　　B.that, by banning the dangerous sports, we can improve the law.

　　C.that we must take positive steps to improve social welfare system.

　　D.to show law is the main instrument of social change.

　　Vocabulary

　　1.relish 从……获得乐处，享受

　　2.orgy 狂欢，放纵

　　3.arena 竞技场，活动或斗争的场所

　　4.blood-thirsty 残忍的，嗜血的

　　5.bear-baiting 逗熊游戏

　　6.bull-fight 斗牛

　　7.batter 猛击，连续地猛打/捶，乱打

　　8.pulp 成纸浆，成软块

　　9.burst into flames 突然燃烧起来/着火

　　10.grim 令人窒息的，简陋的

　　11.coop up 把……关起来

　　答案详解

　　1.A.不太高。文章一开始就点出科技巨大进步，而其他方面进展很少。人们以轻蔑的口气谈及可怜的古罗马人，因为他们欣赏竞技场上的屠杀。我们轻视他们，因为他们把这些屠杀视为娱乐。我们可以降阶/屈尊地谅解他们，因为他们生活在2000年前，显然，对好的东西不知道。在这里作者反问，我们的优越感是否正确呢?我们的嗜血性是不是少一些?为什么拳击比赛吸引那么许多人?在场的观赏者(观众)是不是也希望看到一些暴力呢?结论是：人类和过去一样残忍。唯一的不同点在于古罗马人很诚实，他们承认他们欣赏观看饥饿的狮子把人撕碎，活生生吃掉，而我们会找出各种精辟的理由来保卫早该制止的运动。第二段举出具体例子，如斗牛、拳击中把人打瘫在地、车赛中，车子碰撞起火，人们就坐在那里观看欣赏，参赛者是为了高报酬，观众付出大笔钱财是为了看到暴力。作者指出任何体育精神的说法纯粹是虚伪。如果一场打比赛(世界重量级冠军赛)，两轮而不是十五轮就告结束，成千上百万人们会感到失望――这些都证明人的卑下，不文明。这两段似乎也证明作者的观点应该是C项――蔑视的。但在第三段谈及，好几个世纪以来，人们一直试图在精神上和情感上改善自己，又得承认不怎么成功。可至少我们不再容忍疯人禁锢于笼中，当众鞭挞，以及其他许多过去普遍存在的野蛮行径。监狱也不再是过去那种令人窒息的禁锢之地，社会福利制度在全世界许多地方推行。在财富公平分配上也作了很大的努力。这些变化的出现不是因为人突然改善，而是在改变法律上采取了积极的步骤。如果我们禁止危险的暴力体育项目，那么我们在改善人类方面又前进了一步。我们会认识暴力是人类的堕落和卑下(人类不应有的)。从这段来看，作者对人类还抱有希望，不是很蔑视。所以选A项。

　　2.A.法律应禁止堕落而又危险的体育项目。见第一题注释。作者从古罗马人欣赏残忍的体育项目说起，点出现代人也是嗜血成性，喜欢暴力体育项目。这是不文明，是堕落。必须制止，而法律是我们社会改革最强大的工具，它可应用，发挥强大的文明影响(第三段倒数第三句)

　　B.人们愿意支付巨大款项来观看暴力。这是作者说明“嗜血成性”的具体内容之一。

　　C.对比对危险体育项目不同的态度。这里没有对比。

　　D.人类嗜血成性。这是作者认为人们为什么欣赏危险残忍体育项目的根源。

　　3.D.人们在体育上习惯于“嗜血成性”，过去是，现在仍然是，不同点只是前者坦直承认，后者婉转掩饰。见第一题注释。

　　A.把古罗马人和现代人对比。这项没有说明对比什么。

　　B.给出一个例子。太抽象。

　　C.说明过去人类不太知道更美好的东西，这两项都没有到位。

　　4.B.5个。作者提到

　　⑴逗熊游戏；

　　⑵斗牛；

　　⑶车赛；